One Entrepreneur’s Story: Why Wesabe Lost to Mint.com

By Carol Tice edited by Dan Bova Oct 14, 2010

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

anybody’s fault but their own why his personal-finance Web site lost the race bought by Intuit
  • Being the first mover isn’t everything. Though popular rumor had it that Mint started first, in fact Wesabe launched 10 months earlier. Waiting allowed Mint’s team to analyze where Wesabe fell short and design a better offering.
  • Choose your name carefully. Wesabe went with a goofy name in hopes it might be the next Yahoo! or Google. But Mint’s far more intuitive name attracted more visitors, and browsers had no idea what Wesabe was about based on the name.
  • Earning revenue does not equal success. Wesabe was generating money from late 2008 on — it just wasn’t enough money to sustain the business.
  • Going viral isn’t necessary. Neither Wesabe nor Mint had explosive visitor growth, and since its acquisition, Mint’s has gone up and down. Total traffic matters, though, and Mint ultimately attracted five times the visitors of Wesabe, he reports.
  • Make the user experience easy. Hedlund gives himself 40 lashes for not jumping on Yodlee, a technology that makes it easy for consumers to pull together their financial data. Wesabe’s system was harder to use as a result, driving customers interested in personal finance into the arms of Yodlee-enabled Mint.
  • Get noticed. Mint garnered buzz by winning the first TechCrunch 40 conference. From there on, it was like Wesabe didn’t exist in the minds of key influencers, and the company faded from view.
anybody’s fault but their own why his personal-finance Web site lost the race bought by Intuit
  • Being the first mover isn’t everything. Though popular rumor had it that Mint started first, in fact Wesabe launched 10 months earlier. Waiting allowed Mint’s team to analyze where Wesabe fell short and design a better offering.
  • Choose your name carefully. Wesabe went with a goofy name in hopes it might be the next Yahoo! or Google. But Mint’s far more intuitive name attracted more visitors, and browsers had no idea what Wesabe was about based on the name.
  • Earning revenue does not equal success. Wesabe was generating money from late 2008 on — it just wasn’t enough money to sustain the business.
  • Going viral isn’t necessary. Neither Wesabe nor Mint had explosive visitor growth, and since its acquisition, Mint’s has gone up and down. Total traffic matters, though, and Mint ultimately attracted five times the visitors of Wesabe, he reports.
  • Make the user experience easy. Hedlund gives himself 40 lashes for not jumping on Yodlee, a technology that makes it easy for consumers to pull together their financial data. Wesabe’s system was harder to use as a result, driving customers interested in personal finance into the arms of Yodlee-enabled Mint.
  • Get noticed. Mint garnered buzz by winning the first TechCrunch 40 conference. From there on, it was like Wesabe didn’t exist in the minds of key influencers, and the company faded from view.

The rest of this article is locked.

Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

Subscribe Now

Already have an account? Sign In

Carol Tice

Owner of Make a Living Writing
Longtime Seattle business writer Carol Tice has written for Entrepreneur, Forbes, Delta Sky and many more. She writes the award-winning Make a Living Writing blog. Her new ebook for Oberlo is Crowdfunding for Entrepreneurs.

Related Content